Every value the platform fills, and every flag it raises, traces back to the USCIS form, instruction, regulation, or statute behind it — so review is a check, not a rebuild.
Every supported USCIS form carries its own set of rules drawn directly from the live instructions — the re-request triggers, the bars, the math. When something is off, the platform points at the exact field and tells you what the instructions say.
I-130REVIEW
Petitioner is an LPR sponsoring a parent
An LPR may not petition for a parent. Confirm petitioner's status or re-route the relationship.
SourceINA § 201(b)(2)(A)(i) · 8 CFR § 204.1(a)(1)
I-864MATH
Household size includes the principal applicant
Sponsor's household-size count missed +1 for the principal beneficiary. Recompute the 125% threshold.
SourceI-864 Instr. 10/17/24 · Pt 5 · p.9
Every flag carries the rule and the source — defensible, not opaque.
What this gives an attorney
✓Rules cite their source. Every validation carries its origin — e.g. "I-130 Instructions 04/01/24, Page 1, Item 2" — so an officer's reading is the same reading you can verify in seconds.
✓Errors land where you'd look. Every flag points at the specific answer on the form that triggered it — inline, next to the field — instead of in a separate list you have to reconcile.
✓Roles handled correctly. The platform knows the difference between a Petitioner, Beneficiary, Sponsor, and Applicant — and puts each person's facts in the right place on each form based on the role they hold.
✓Edge cases surface, not hide. When a client's facts don't fit a standard USCIS option (e.g. U.S. national vs. LPR on I-130), the platform calls it out with a note instead of silently picking the wrong choice.
